On Monday, 5 March 2012 at 11:37, flex wrote:
> hi, all:
> 
> i want to require my own ruby class in a custom function, now i put the ruby 
> file in the same directory with custom function, and require it in the 
> function file like this:
> 
> require File.join([File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__)), 'test.rb'])
> 
> but i think this is too ugly, is there any other way?
> 
> -- 
> System Administrator, Focus on System Management and Basic Development
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com 
> (mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com).
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> (mailto:puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com).
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Hi,

I'm doing something like this in my scripts (not exactly puppet custom 
modules/facts but it will do the trick):

$LOAD_PATH << File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/../lib')

then you can use `require test' construction.

Best,
-- 
Dominik Zyla



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to