On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 14:55, Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com> wrote: > Sorry for the long delay, had my head down on some other issues. Reply > below. > > On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> Yes. It sounds like the current storage of reports isn't going to >> work well for you, at least if you want to retain history. This is >> absolutely unfortunate, and is one of the serious shortfalls we are >> aware of around the Dashboard and StoreConfigs databases. We are >> working on improving these, but there isn't anything presently public >> available. > > My main concern here is that we're keeping a large amount of data twice. We > have the report file, and then we have all of the same content in the > database. I think that it should be documented: > > 1. What does keeping the reports around give you? > 2. What does keeping the database reports around give you? > > If I am right, we could stop storing the reports for as long if we can > browse them in the dashboard interface, right? Or is there some loss of > functionality by discarding reports after just a few days?
Yeah, you can ditch the files on disk in favour of the database with no real loss of anything. -- Daniel Pittman ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
