I'm pretty sure he means that that code is already there (note: currently too laz... euh busy to look that up), he just doesn't know how to make it apply.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:22, Felix Frank <felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 01/13/2012 09:31 AM, Antonio Xanxess wrote: >> Hi Frank, > > Actually it's Felix :) > >> Thanks for the reply, but in principle I think that there is no need >> for this procedure because the resource itself package can do, besides >> not a good practice to patch existing functionality. > > Uhm, what? o_O > > You talk about savaging the apt provider code to somehow include > --force-yes into the apt-get options, then point out how patching > existing functionality is bad practice? Huh. > > Frankly, pushing a hacked apt provider to all your agents will be much > more invasive than falling back to a manifest-based workaround. > > Regards, > Felix > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > -- Walter Heck -- follow @walterheck on twitter to see what I'm up to! -- Check out my new startup: Server Monitoring as a Service @ http://tribily.com Follow @tribily on Twitter and/or 'Like' our Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/tribily -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
