On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Adam Gibbins <a...@adamgibbins.com> wrote: > On 6 October 2011 18:15, Jeffrey Ollie <j...@ocjtech.us> wrote: >> >> Having this feature would be very useful to me... Other than doing >> the work myself, is there any hope of getting this any time soon? > > This doesn't really seem the work of a provider, but rather a define. > Could you not just wrap a file block and a mount inside a define?
I think that the problem with that is that you are dealing with two different directories that have the same name. There's the original directory that is used as a mount point and then there's the directory that is mounted on top of that. AFAIK puppet can't deal with that situation using only a define. -- Jeff Ollie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
