I could see a use case for it. When generating the facts.yaml for use with 
mcollective, the reports are showing always at 1 change because of that even if 
I set the log level to debug. That file will always change every run because 
the information stored in facter is changes with each run.

I can't think of another use case but I'm sure there might be others.

On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:16, Nigel Kersten <ni...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> 
>> As per: https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/7555
>> it looks like we've got some use cases around excluding some resources from
>> being reported on to reduce noise.
> 
> This feels like solving the problem on the wrong side to me.
> 
>> Should we implement a metaparameter like this? Do the use cases justify
>> breaking the consistency of the model (report on everything) ?
> 
> This is worse than that: it bakes in the assumption that the reports
> are *not* a graph, or that we can just discard structural elements in
> that graph, by allowing us to ditch what would otherwise be a vertex.
> 
> One of the proposed enhancements to the report - which I think is
> hugely valuable - is that we return the augmented graph from the
> client side, where things like file recursion, or autorequires, can
> change the catalog we sent down.  Excluding something from that may be
> a huge structural change, and it is certainly going to make
> correlation between that graph and the original catalog extremely
> difficult to discover.
> 
> So, no, I do not believe we should support this.  Better, I think, to
> support that feature in our reporting tools, or make it easier for
> people to build that in their tools.
> 
> Daniel
> -- 
> ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
> ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to