On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:44 PM, treydock <treyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've recently been looking to move my KVM management (currently via > Puppet and virt-manager) to something web-based and robust (ie > "Cloud"), and came across OpenQRM. Looking at the features list it > mentions "puppet Class/Machine management". Has anyone that uses > Puppet extensively given this a try? I'd like to get input on how > this works. The only ENC or GUI interface I've used with Puppet is > Foreman (which is awesome btw), but this peaked my interest. Thus far > I've tried Cloudstack (a few months ago) and Convirt, both were great, > but not what I needed.
BTW not sure if you saw it, but foreman supports libvirt/kvm out of the box, and we are working on adding additional actualization management support such as rhevm (once released --> in the upcoming weeks), vmware and ec2. if you have any improvement suggestions, or why foreman was not good enough, would love to hear that.. thanks, Ohad > > Any input on experiences with OpenQRM as it relates to Puppet would be > great, thanks. > > - Trey > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
