On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
> 'm not asking puppet to know what to do, which I agree is ridiculous. I'm
> saying that if and only if I've defined X::disabled, automatically run it on
> every host which does not include X. If X::disabled isn't defined, then don't
> do anything. Probably a better way to think of it instead of X::disabled is
> that for ever class X there is an implicitly defined not-X class, which is
> empty until I define it. For example:
>
> class webserver {
> package {apache: ensure => installed}
> service {apache: ensure => running}
> }
> class !webserver {
> package {apache: ensure => absent}
> }
> class dnsserver {
> [...]
> }
I like this approach!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
