On 05/18/2011 05:18 PM, Patrick wrote: > > On May 18, 2011, at 1:20 AM, patant wrote: > >> Good idea! >> >> >> Now I found another problem. >> Some facts dosent't works when I call them explicit. >> >> The facter shows up in the list when I run facter --puppet. >> But when I call facter --puppet <facter name> it dosen't give me the value >> that I got in the list. Returns nothing. >> >> "facter" gives me: >> ---------- >> uptime => 2 days >> uptime_days => 2 >> uptime_hours => 49 >> uptime_seconds => 178750 >> virtual => physical >> >> "facter uptime_seconds" >> gives me nothing. > > I've seen a problem similar to this, and with that problem, the puppet fact > works just fine. So I'd test it in puppet and ignore the problem if puppet > is fine. >
IIRC the reason is that the fact doesn't live in a file called <factname>.rb. Is this the case here? Otherwise I second Patrick's notion: Ignore the commandline weirdness and go ahead. Regards, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.