On 1.5.2011 10:15, Sans wrote: > Hi Steven and vagn, > > I almost forgot about ldconfig, I had a look now and ldconfig doesn't > appear to be working in this particular case. It's conventional for > the so_name to be the name+major version of the library (although, not > universally done), so ldconfig will create a link like "foo.so.1 -> > foo.so.1.1.1" and "foo.so.1.1 -> foo.so.1.1.1" but *not* foo.so -> > foo.so.1.1.1, as far as I understand. It should be created manually, I > suppose. Cheers!!
foo.so is normally provided by the foo-devel package. Why do you need foo.so ? -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
