In our environ, there are several services that are deployed via an NFS mount, so that the executables and configs are consistent across the board.
Is there any reason why this couldn't be done with Puppet? For example, each individual system would contain its own /etc/puppet and rc.d and pid files -- but the primary deployment would come from NFS. For that matter, as Enterprise Puppet is doing, why couldn't we just mirror that installation model and install our own version of ruby under that mount point, and walla. A separate mount for x86 and x86_64. Thoughts? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
