> realize(User[1], User[2], .... User[10]) > > > ah, but your collection syntax requires that you have to know the gid of > the resources you are realizing :) > > There are certainly cases where the collection syntax is easier, but I > feel that the vast majority of virtual resource realizations I see in > the wild are for one or two resources where the name is known.
Not to mention "realize(User[1,2,...,10])". It would be nice if multiple overrides failed from this syntax just the way it fails for inheritance. But that's probably hard to implement? Regards, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
