> 2. is going to do unnecessary work (and I'll have to create the user
> if they don't exist anyway)

I've written types that do this with great success.  Be careful that
performing that repetitive action isn't expensive or otherwise
degrading to normal operation.  If it creates any kind of race
condition or nasty blocking behavior, you may be best off with option
3.

Rich

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to