On Nov 24, 3:50 pm, Nigel Kersten <ni...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: > I mentioned this in an earlier thread, but here's a dedicated one. > > We made a big change between 0.24.x and 0.25.x where we moved from > XMLRPC to REST. > > How do people feel about us dropping all XMLRPC support from 2.7.x, > such that it only supported Puppet clients 0.25.x and higher?
+1 to dropping .24 and 2.7 interoperability. I don't recall running mismatched client/server ever being a suggested setup. How many sites out there are actually running .24 with 2.6, or even .25, as a stable setup? People seem to be conflating legacy support with interversion compatibility. From the Puppet Enterprise announcement I thought it was clear there was a path for LTS type support. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
