On 11/17/2010 02:00 AM, elliott wrote: > Hi all, new to puppet so excuse my noobiness :) > > I've got a puppet type to manage iptables rules (https://github.com/ > camptocamp/puppet-iptables) running in my development environment. > The module works great for the most part; rules are calculated and > applied in the right order. The problem is, it never seems to trigger > a "save". > > I've got this in my iptables class manifest, per the documents: > > Iptables { > before => Exec["save iptables rules"], > notify => Exec["save iptables rules"], > } > exec { "save iptables rules": > command => "/etc/init.d/iptables save", > refreshonly => true, > } > > and the notifies seem to get created correctly: > > # puppetd --environment=development --debug --test --server=puppet | > grep subscribes > debug: /Iptables[03 icmp -- time-exceeded]/notify: subscribes to > Exec[save iptables rules]
Err, what? Iptables[] subscribes to Exec[]? That doesn't sound right. > debug: //rhel/Service[ntpd]/subscribe: subscribes to File[/etc/ > ntp.conf] Service[] describes to File[] - that's more intuitive. But then, this is probably just awkward because both notify and subscribe use the same log notation. Other than that, I remember having issues with notify and/or subscribe where defines of my own where involved. I think notify didn't work for my define that wrapped the file type. I'm not sure though, and in my case, subscribe was an option. Could there be a way to subscribe => Iptables["*"] or somesuch? Regards, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
