On Oct 4, 2:31 pm, "Eduardo S. Scarpellini" <scarpell...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Oliver,
> we use CSM hook-scripts to validate any ''.pp'' or ''.erb'' files and it
> works perfectly.
> I recommend you look at INOTIFY kernel feature for wait for I/O events in
> puppet modules directory. You can do that trought INCROND
> (http://linux.die.net/man/8/incrond- crontab like) or homemade scripts
> (perl, python, etc).
>
> Read more at:http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8478
Thanks, that's a good suggestion that I had considered before. I'll
look into it.
>
> []s
>
> 2010/10/4 Oliver Hookins <ohook...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Part of my rollout scripts contains a "puppet --parseonly" check of
> > all of our manifests and modules to do basic pre-runtime checks of
> > syntax (or so I thought). It basically finds all applicable modules
> > and echos an "import $MODULENAME" for each to the standard input of
> > puppet, to which I also pass --manifest site.pp to give it the entry
> > point to our top-level manifests.
>
> > What it actually does is parse all of the manifests explicitly
> > imported/included from site.pp, and parse the init.pp of all imported
> > modules but nothing else. We've only just discovered this
> > unfortunately after seeing syntax errors not being picked up in module
> > subclasses. The "easy" solution of running something like find -iname
> > "*.pp" -exec puppet --parseonly '{}' \; takes something like 5m30s on
> > my local SSD drive so this is not a possibility. The puppet utility
> > will not parse multiple files if you pass them to it, it seems but
> > perhaps this is not the best way of doing things.
>
> > I've read many other approaches on this list, most of which entail
> > running pre- or post-commit hooks from version control to check the
> > most recently changed files, but for various reasons this isn't
> > possible for us. I'd like to know if there would be any interest in
> > being able to pass multiple files to puppet (to save constant re-
> > initialization and forking new processes), and would it be feasible to
> > implement?
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Puppet Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@google
> > groups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
> --
> Eduardo S. Scarpellini
> <scarpell...@gmail.com>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
