Thanks Jewels. Looks like we are on similar paths. I really appreciate the info.
On Sep 22, 3:11 pm, Jewels <islandje...@gmail.com> wrote: > take a look at this > thread:http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users/browse_thread/thread/20fc... > > I am doing the same thing -- a puppet master populates an area on > another puppet master, which then configures hosts that I do not > control, but I still sort of maintain control, since I push the > changes to the other servers. As indicated in the thread - I had to > make a few simple changes in the SSL paths for certs. Other than that > - it works just fine. > > On Sep 22, 1:20 pm, Mikel King <mikel.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have an environment where there is a huge amount of political strife > > as well as disparate divisional and departmental LANS. Some are tied > > via rather unreliable connectivity. My predecessor sold the campus on > > the idea of deploying puppet in a tier of top level masters > > configuring departmental masters which in turn may be required to > > configure divisional masters. > > > Has anyone ever run into this sort of sophisticated puppetry before? > > In order for me to sink this predetermined solution and propose an > > alternative architecture I must carefully weigh all possibilities. > > > Thanks in advance. Any dialog or guidance would be greatly > > appreciated. > > > Cheers, > > m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
