I think this should work - but I don't want to break production - so.. There are several firewalls involved, but I can open 8140 as needed. So if I have a master server in one subnet and a client/master in another net - here is what I am thinking.
The first master is well protected, call it "A" and the 2nd is "B" which has both the client and Master server on it. I want the B client to point to A-master and be able to get updated files. But as those files are updated on B, the B-Master will service those same groups of files/configs, etc, out to a whole other group of clients.. Any issues or problems with this that anyone can think of? The reason for this is simple - the "B" Master is the only one who has access to a whole bunch of clients on the other side, but A has to get files from it's protected subnets and push them out to B.. Ok, my head hurts now.. ~J~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
