Douglas Garstang wrote: > > Really? Are you serious???. Why is puppet dictating to me that it will
Quite serious. > only autoload classes if I have a class named module::disable, > module::virtualhost? Who's idea was that and why? This seems awfully > arbitrary. Why shouldn't it be arbitrary? The autoloader is there to make using modules easier. The current model represents a standard loading model that controls what is loaded and operates by the principle of least surprise. That's not to say it can't be improved or changed and if you have a suggestion about how it should autoload or an alterative scheme please feel free to log a ticket. I'd also like to address the tone of your emails to the list - I find requests will generally dictate the tone of replies. I've noted that you obviously find Puppet quite frustrating on occasion and this seems to be reflected in the tone of your emails to the list. We, both Puppet Labs and the community, recognize Puppet isn't perfect - no solution is - and we're working to improve it every day. I personally don't think a constant stream of "Puppet is stupid, I hate Puppet, Puppet sucks, I can't believe Puppet does it this way and that's stupid" emails help that process. What is an awesome contribution to making Puppet better is reasoned feedback, ideas, alternatives, changes ... oh and especially patches ... like every open source project we love patches. You can send these to the list or even better in the form of tickets: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/ We welcome the input - it's what drives Puppet forward. Regards James Turnbull -- Puppet Labs - http://www.puppetlabs.com C: 503-734-8571 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
