On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:15 AM, seph <s...@directionless.org> wrote:
> Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> writes: > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Klaus Ethgen > > <klaus+pup...@ethgen.de <klaus%2bpup...@ethgen.de>< > klaus%2bpup...@ethgen.de <klaus%252bpup...@ethgen.de>> > > >> Ah. Bad. I have no account there and I dislike the idea to create a > >> account anywhere to just report a bug. I have that many accounts sprayed > >> around the net that I do not want to manage one more, sorry. > >> > > > > That's kind of a crappy approach don't you think? > > > > Have you ever dealt with a bug reporter that accepts anonymous bug > reports? > > It's almost impossible to treat such reports seriously as you're often > not > > quite sure whether you've fixed the issue or not because you can't get in > > contact with the original reporter. > > I'm with the original poster on this. I dislike random barriers in the > way of me providing valuable debugging info. I *used* to be able to > submit bugreports without much work. I could email places, or just enter > them. > > Then spammers discovered the internet, and everything got harder. Now > there are lots of hoops I need to jump through to ask questions, submit > bugs, whatever. The higher barrier tends to push me to not bothering for > most things. > > It's not a "random barrier" though. I agree it should be easier, and I believe there's a bug in about making sure OpenID works, but I stand by my point that it's bloody difficult to track bugs reported anonymously. -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
