On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Alan McKay <alan.mc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was just digging through the archives and found some comments from > Sept 2008 about CPAN provider being immature.
Personally, I wouldn't want a CPAN provider -- if you can get content from OS packages (debian is particularly good about this), I would use those. CPAN's need to build things locally and update at unpredictable intervals (and frequently not building) means I really wouldn't want to connect a production machine directly to it. Doing really minimal packaging for the CPAN modules you use, if not already packaged, would be worth it in my opinion. --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
