Ah of course! I were testing this first with one node, then on the
puppetmaster I added File <<| title == "list-updates" |>>, which of
course is acceptable since it only sees one File[X] resource, but when
i added the list-updates class on the puppetmaster, it sees two.
Thanks alot Ken :)
On 7 apr, 00:25, Ken <k...@bob.sh> wrote:
> You've got to think about it from the servers perspective ... its
> going to see many File["list-update"] resources ... one for each
> machine in fact. Which is why you're getting that error. Each machines
> definition is trying to overwrite the other:
>
> @@file { "list-updates":
> ensure => present,
> path => "/opt/puppet/list-updates/${fqdn}",
> source => "file:///tmp/puppet-list-updates",
> backup => false,
>
> }
>
> File <<| title == "list-updates" |>>
>
> The name of the resource needs to be unique when being imported, so
> I'd change your configuration to use the path as the name because in
> your case it _is_ going to be unique because of the fqdn var. Then
> search for tags for instead for the import.
>
> For example:
>
> @@file { "/opt/puppet/list-updates/${fqdn}":
> ensure => present,
> source => "file:///tmp/puppet-list-updates",
> backup => false,
> tag => "foo"
>
> }
>
> And then on the server use:
>
> File <<| tag == "foo" |>>
>
> ken.
>
> On Apr 6, 3:00 pm, Tore <tore.lo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've runned into a fairly common problem:
> > err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on
> > SERVER: Exported resource File[list-updates] cannot override local
> > resource on node
> > Xhttp://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequently_Asked_...
>
> > I cannot see how I can fix this. On all of my nodes i add the class
> > "list-updates", and on the puppetmaster i add "list-updates" AND "list-
> > updates::all".
>
> > The manifests:http://pastebin.com/vXqP2q6q
>
> > Of course this can be prevented by not including "list-updates" on the
> > puppetmaster. But, this problems occours since the puppetmaster
> > creates and uses an stored configuration. But why doesn't this pose a
> > problem when using
> > sshkeys?http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Exported_Resou...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
