On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Eric Shamow <eric.sha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A not-so-elegant solution is to write your own yum provider that
> allows you to do this.  In my case I found one online -- if you google
> yum_plus.rb you should be able to find it.  If not let me know and
> I'll post the work here.
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Isaac Christoffersen
> <isaac.christoffer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We're using RHN Satellite server to manage our packages and we have a
> custom
> > package channel for third-party packages.  Unfortunately, some of the
> > packages in the channel are unsigned.
> >
> > Is there a way to get the Package Provider for yum to use the nogpgcheck
> > option?  Right now, I'm using an exec declaration instead of a package,
> but
> > it seems kludgy to do this.
> >
> > Of course, from a larger perspective, I'd like to be able to pass any
> valid
> > yum option via the package syntax in Puppet.  (i.e. Download Only, Enable
> > Repo, Group Install, etc.)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Isaac
> >
> >
> > --
>

I just created a separate repository for those packages, and turned off
gpgcheck.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to