On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Scott Smith <sc...@ohlol.net> wrote: > On 3/22/10 1:26 PM, Paul Lathrop wrote: >> >> Scott, >> >> I know it defaults to production if a environment is not specified. >> However, that's not the case here. The client *is* specifying an >> environment, the server doesn't know about that environment. I think >> this is different than what you are describing - if the client does >> not specify an environment, it is totally sane/correct to pass out the >> "production" manifests. However, if the client specifies an >> environment the server doesn't know about, isn't it at least worth >> warning about? > > Yeah, sorry--I was not clear in my agreement that it should probably behave > differently. I did understand your problem and have observed it myself. The > work around is to not use "production" and make it a stubbed environment > with no real manifest.
I have a 'noop' environment I default to, which logs to the server that someone has hit it, and I'm planning to monitor counts of that when I get around to it... > > But yeah, +1 on wishing to see different behavior. > > -scott > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
