On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Trevor Vaughan <tvaug...@onyxpoint.com> wrote:
> This is true and, unfortunately, I couldn't get to the presentation either.

I got to read a copy over the shoulder of someone here with a login.

I thought it was pretty skimpy really, and didn't really adequately
cover the advantages of either system.


>
> It's pretty well known that, given any two similar systems, the one
> written in a lower level language will probably always win in terms of
> speed and resource usage and lose in terms of community extensibility.
>
> It all comes down to what you're actually looking for in the tool.
>
> Trevor
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:59 AM, R P Herrold <herr...@owlriver.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>>>
>>>> How, if at all, do any of you do capacity planning with Puppet?
>>>
>>> somewhat orthogonal to the question, but after reading this piece:
>>>        http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/2010-02/pdfs/bjorgeengen.pdf
>>> at
>>>        http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/2010-02/index.html
>>>
>>> ... doing capacity planning for puppet presently may represent a 'premature
>>> optimization'
>>
>> How is knowing how many clients your current infrastructure supports a
>> premature optimization?
>>
>> Although that pdf is in 'teal', it doesn't actually appear to be
>> available without a usenix login, which I don't have.
>>
>>>
>>> The seeming speed and scaling differences between CFengine and puppet are
>>> dramatic, and one has to ask if puppet is the right tool to bet on, in its
>>> present form
>>
>> The default configurations of the two are radically different.
>>
>> There's nothing stopping you mimicking a CFengine style setup with
>> puppet. Set up an rsync server, have your clients fetch the manifests
>> and compile them locally.
>>
>> We've considered it several times for performance reasons, but I'd
>> like to avoid exposing the raw manifests to my clients, even if you
>> fake out environments by setting different rsync sources.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -- Russ herrold
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Puppet Users" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> nigel
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Puppet Users" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Trevor Vaughan
> Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
> (410) 541-6699
> tvaug...@onyxpoint.com
>
> -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>



-- 
nigel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to