On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Tim Stoop <tim.st...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Brice,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, but alas, it seems to default to mtime
> 'checksum' then.
>
> On 8 feb, 22:43, Brice Figureau <brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> wrote:
> > In 0.24.x I know it was possible to:
> > checksum => undef
>
> Honestly, knowing how other parts work, I'd expect it to default to
> mtime checksum in 0.24.x too... Thanks for the suggestion, though.
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> If you don't specify source or content, then it should just touch the file.
I am still missing the exact use case for this though.


> --
> Kind regards,
> Tim
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to