On Feb 1, 8:11 am, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote: > Since this is a hack anyway, perhaps it would be quicker and easier to > comment out the relevant include statement, or to use an if statement > to disable it for the particular node in question.
Apologies for following up on my own post, but I realized after I sent that that "Mak[ing] puppet indifferent to package" is just a different way of saying "making a package unmanaged." With the problem cast in those terms, the approaches I suggested follow naturally. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
