On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:07:21 -0800 (PST), James <j...@sngx.net> wrote: > I'm having an issue using package resources on RHEL 4 systems using > up2date with RHN. I need to ensure that libacl.i386 is installed on a > x86_64 system, however the up2date provider does not seem to like the > yum syntax for specifying arch, and there doesn't seem to be any other > method for doing so. > > I found this thread, http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2043, > that is the same issue, but apparently no progress has been made on it > in 10 months. Considering there are a large number of RHEL4 / Centos4 > boxes around, I am surprised that a solution for this has not been > implemented yet. > > Does anyone have a solution for this? Can I extend the package > resource somehow to allow up2date to handle the arch properly?
Never saw any response to this, has anyone run into this issue besides me? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
