Hi Michael, Happy to see you around puppet :)
Thanks, I did see it before, I still chose to implement foreman, a few of the reasons were: 1. I need to support non RH servers (e.g. Debian and Solaris where func and friends don't play ball) 2. I wanted to have one single interface regardless on the os used - e.g. creation of machine is the same processes. 3. I wanted to have a centralized solution - where you can manage many subnets (and datacenters) from one console. 4. Inventory, and Puppet reporting. I know that the Foreman is still lacking some of the features I've mentioned, but its on the right track :) Cheers, Ohad On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Michael DeHaan <michael.deh...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Ohad Levy <ohadl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, that's true, but in my opinion cobbler support in Puppet is > lacking, > > that was one of the reason I've started Foreman. > > > > cheers, > > Ohad > > You may also want to look at Symbolic, which integrates Puppet, Func, > and Cobbler all together in a common UI. > ( http://www.opensymbolic.org/ ) > > You still create profiles in Cobber (it does not duplicate the Cobbler > UI) but it lets you provision them from there after picking them from > dropdowns. > > --Michael > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > >--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
