> > I'd appreciate it if someone would check the accuracy of what I wrote, and > > if > > it's deemed to be accurate and useful, apply it upstream so that it > > will stay in > > the wiki. > > hmm, I'm not sure whether it is now even more misleading than before. > The point with function is that they are evaluated at compile time and > as compilation happens on the master it will also only see things on > the master. > So your example is so far only working if you either run puppet as > standalone app or you are talking about a file resource which will get > applied on the master. > Everything else won't work. > In general your explanation is correct, but I think maybe it is > misleading for some people, as many people don't understand at first > why functions are only evaluated on the master.
Agreed-- see my answer to David. I've backed it out for now and will rework it. > I think it's good to extend the function explanation, there is also > some part in the language tutorial: > http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/LanguageTutorial#functions > Maybe we should simply put the warning in the FunctionReference as > well and redirect for further information to the LanguageTutorial > where people can extend the documentation how they would like to > extend it. > So imho your explanation would fit better there. To me it seems like more specialized material that should go in the reference rather than the tutorial. But wherever it goes best is fine with me. Thanks for your comments. Andrew. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
