jcbollinger wrote: > Following the principle of exercising only documented behavior, I > think Puppet's "redhat" service provider should recognize only those > services reported by chkconfig --list. That would prevent Puppet from > causing a misconfiguration by turning on a service not already managed > by chkconfig. If an ability to register a service with chkconfig is > needed (not clear to me that it is), then that should be controlled by > a separate parameter.
As a debianista I obviously haven't touched chkconfig ever. But in the spirit of DWIM, I would expect a provider to do the magic to get (in this case) an init-script under the control of the chosen tool. Regards, DavidS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
