Hi > the only existing culture is that for file resources directories > automatically get the execute bit. I don't yet see why you'd like to > have a directory without the execute flag set, maybe you can explain? > > This "feature" is one side very helpfull if you have recursive > directories to manage, maybe you know the other side where it isn't that > helpfull.
ok http://www.wellho.net/mouth/2300_What-does-x-on-a-linux-directory-mean-.html gave me some reasons, why you'd like to have the more strict way. I outlined further things in the bug report: http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/2451 > Could you outline what you'd like to have in this policy. Not explicitly > for this question you raised but more in general. Maybe it's indeed > interesting to have one. still interested. cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
