-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Luke Kanies wrote: > Is there any way to make some things fail softly so that they can be > less hard than class-wise fatal? > >> Hmm, no one's ever asked before. > >> It seems reasonable that we could mark some resources as non-fatal, >> but what resources would you mark this way?
Could you mark an include or require as non-fatal? Would that achieve the same end? Regards James Turnbull - -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpmuLgACgkQ9hTGvAxC30DlSgCglgaRghC8SMp+IBfTyBv3OAzS RLMAoJf/9XyPqLkEFdVBJFNBgu+lyTeH =NHy2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
