Fernando Padilla wrote: > great, I'll look at what I can do. > > It's weird there is no RubyGem for the latest 0.25... >
It's not weird - I didn't create Gems for the beta. Partially because you can't version a Ruby Gem with a numeric and text - for example 0.25.0beta1. This increases the risk of a 0.25.0 beta gem being mistaken for production. If Gems allowed proper versioning then I'd create them. Regards James Turnbull -- Author of: * Pro Linux Systems Administration (http://tinyurl.com/linuxadmin) * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://tinyurl.com/pupbook) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://tinyurl.com/pronagios) * Hardening Linux (http://tinyurl.com/hardeninglinux)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
