On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Rob McBroom <mailingli...@skurfer.com> wrote: > > On 2009-Apr-29, at 11:58 AM, Nigel Kersten wrote: > >> hah. I did actually read that, but I didn't express myself well. >> >> I meant to point out explicitly that on OS X say, if you run this as >> non-root, you'll get a user resource definition back, it just won't >> contain the password. > > Ah, OK. Actually, I wanted to just use `ralsh user $USER` as an > example since it would work as written, but I thankfully tested it > first and ran into exactly what you're talking about on my desktop > Mac. `ralsh` doesn't even run on my Linux puppetmaster as a non-root > user, but do I really need it to? No.
Yep. Luke expressed a desire to have as much of ralsh as possible work when not-root, so I decided to simply not return the password hash in that case in the Mac user provider. > > -- > Rob McBroom > <http://www.skurfer.com/> > > > > > -- Nigel Kersten nig...@google.com System Administrator Google, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
