On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:15 PM, go8ose <geo...@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> wrote: > >> >> I'd be interested in a python version of puppet. >> >> Don't get me wrong it's a great tool it's just that I like python a >> lot more than ruby and hence (of course) do most of my scripting in >> python which leads to more python knowledge which leads (for me) to >> easier expansion if it would be python instead of ruby :) >> >> cheers, >> Martin >> >> PS: Just having wild dreams, I wouldn't expect the current codebase to >> be given up because of at least 1 whacko (me, I wouldn't dare calling >> anyone else a bit crazy) :) > > Two wackos. But I know the authors aren't going to throw away the work > they have done and start again in a language that Luke originally > discarded because it annoyed him.
3. ++ to what everyone else said. There has been discussion around a future version of Facter allowing for facts to be provided by executables in a certain directory, which is about as far as I can see Python integration with Puppet going. -- Nigel Kersten Systems Administrator Tech Lead - MacOps --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
