I can see myself being in the minority on this. I think it comes from my intense aversion toward data replication :)
On Nov 13, 3:05 pm, Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:53 AM, RijilV wrote: > > > > > 2008/11/13 Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:51 PM, joe wrote: > > > > That makes sense, though I would think if you have recurse => true > > and > > > a subscribe/notify, then checksumming should be enabled by default > > in > > > that scenario also. It may not be feasible depending on the > > internal > > > workings of puppet, but that would seem to be the expected behavior. > > > I guess I'm of two minds, but this doesn't really come up very often > > -- most people don't seem to want to do recursive checking without > > having a remote source. > > > Anyone else have an opinion? > > > I'd rather not checksum recursively without explicitly stating to do > > so. > > *whew* :) > > -- > Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the > middle of it. -- P. J. O'Rourke > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Luke Kanies |http://reductivelabs.com|http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
