Jeff Leggett wrote: > I see what you're doing, but I question WHY? The amount of time you > have spent troubleshooting this could have been better spent bringing > up a small LDAP Directory that would both resolve these issues, work > well with Puppet, and allow you a lot more flexibility in the future. >
While I agree that LDAP is the ideal solution (as I mentioned in the original post), that's a separate issue on someone else's plate and my design cannot assume a directory service that does not currently exist in that environment. Once it is in place, I will obviously modify the configs to accommodate that setup since Puppet, as you mentioned, works well with LDAP. So while I don't disagree, I don't want my Puppet rollout being blocked by an LDAP rollout. That being said, I gained a much better understanding of how Puppet works, and learned some Ruby in the process, which I hardly see as a waste of time. But I do appreciate the feedback. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
