On Tuesday, July 7, 2015 at 11:56:24 AM UTC-5, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > > I was thinking exactly the same as Eric. > > It seems like we're repeating what Git does. > > Perhaps I am too influenced by the "last known good" designation for something that in fact is *not* necessarily known to be good. Nevertheless, if Puppet is going to perform caching along the lines that Chris described at all, then maintaining a cache with genuine known goodness (or at least affirmatively asserted goodness) seems a natural extension that wouldn't require much more work.
John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/996bc122-d677-40bf-9e13-0ea965beec5f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
