On 12/15/2014 10:18 AM, eric gisse wrote: > I'm opening this up to thoughts on how to do PUP-3765 > <https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-3765> properly. Am I going > in the right direction or is there a better way? > > Note: stuff like separate providers was discussed and I hate it deeply > due to maintainability/usability concerns. Keeping it in the provider > feels like the way to go, I'm just having a bit of an issue with a > proper implementation.
Hi, where was this discussed? The ticket has no comments and no links. A separate set of providers seems undesirable to me as well. We would be looking at a) lots of code duplication or b) a layer of inheritance that serves a pretty weak purpose. The question of "is SELinux enabled or not" is independent of "which tool chain should be used to manage OS services". Anyway, I see no reason why anyone would not want any given provider to Just Work, SELinux or not. What is your implementation's approach and what issues are you facing? Thanks, Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/548F5A2A.3060408%40Alumni.TU-Berlin.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
