If anyone does tool integration PLEASE make it opt-in.

It's always fun trying to explain why your tools are pounding on the inside
of a corporate firewall.

Trevor

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Gareth Rushgrove <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 7 September 2014 15:57, Spencer Krum <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Puppet-dev,
> >
> > I've been working, with a lot of help from some others, on a new project
> at
> > http://puppet-analytics.org. It is very much in the
> experimental/development
> > phase and I'm looking for feedback and help.
> >
> > The goal of this project is to enable module authors and users greater
> > visibility into module use. The architecture is modeled after Debian's
> > popularity contest, where a program on the debian system reports to a
> > central server about package use. This means that Puppet users can
> > submit(through a json/http endpoint) 'hey I've deployed this version of
> > stdlib!'. After a bunch of users have been reporting for a while, module
> > maintainers can see the trends, identify which versions of the modules
> are
> > being used, etc. Similarly users can see which modules are the most
> popular,
> > which versions of those modules are the most popular, etc.
> >
> > There is an arbitrary tagging system built in that allows users to report
> > that the deploy is being performed by their ci infrastructure, by a
> > developer doing testing, or by an operator pushing code to production.
> This
> > allows people viewing the data to see the 'true' numbers, unpolluted by
> ci
> > systems or runaway webcrawlers.
> >
> > Reporting can be done with curl, or with a script. Right now there is a
> > script and example curl to report to puppet analytics at:
> > https://github.com/nibalizer/puppet-analytics-client. I think everyone's
> > infrastructure looks a little different, so writing a generic tool to
> report
> > to PA would be pretty hard. I'd like puppet-analytics-client to become a
> > place to put scripts and tools to hit PA.
> >
> > I'm interested in your thoughts an opinions. Especially around the opt-in
> > architecture. Would you be willing to report to PA? Do you think we would
> > ever be able to get enough people reporting that the data would be
> > significant? All the code is open source on github
> > (https://github.com/nibalizer/puppet-analytics). The website is hosted
> on
> > digital ocean. I also have the mental model that people would report
> after
> > every code change to their Puppet infrastructure, i.e. in the post-commit
> > hook if using dynamic environments. Is this a model you agree with? Do
> you
> > have a different idea?
> >
> > We have had a lot of conversations, on this list, and in person, around
> > 'what are people doing with puppet?' I think a tool like this could
> really
> > help us figure out which modules are being used the most often.
> >
> > Please note that PA is not nearly done yet. Much of the empty space I
> expect
> > will be filled in with cool visualizations of the data. It is liable to
> > break at any time, especially with actual users. One of the cool features
> > that is currently in PR is the ability to have shields.io downloads tags
> > come from PA and show up in the ReadMe's of our modules.
> >
>
> I mentioned last night at the Portland Puppet User Group that I think
> from a module developers point of view this is really cool.
>
> A couple of things I said which may be worth repeating are that rapid
> integration with some of the dependency tools could net lots of data
> quickly, for instance:
>
> * librarian-puppet
> * r10k
> * geppetto
> * vagrant
>
> Probably some others I've forgotten.
>
> Gareth
>
> > Thanks everybody,
> > Spencer
> >
> > --
> > Spencer Krum
> > (619)-980-7820
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Puppet Developers" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CADt6FWPoK7N6pwPj4h6_84p-6WEwtz3N6zJbuJniRkHaMi9HBA%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> Gareth Rushgrove
> @garethr
>
> devopsweekly.com
> morethanseven.net
> garethrushgrove.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CAFi_6yKyY03L-NMdo2qy%3DeNSZYQPWem8bJUeeoBU3_yJLfpkmQ%40mail.gmail.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699
[email protected]

-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANs%2BFoVaOZatVtyjXBPAZG-4SDwEwQ7nBNG2pj%3DXNQJ8oHm6zg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to