On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Andy Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2236: Basic idea is in the right direction, but after a lot of > discussion we came to the conclusion that this is a really a packaging time > thing. *Andy* will write up a response and some suggestions on the PR. >
I'm a little confused since the purpose of the change in behavior is to avoid forcing end users to repackage puppet in order to get the desired behavior. If this remains a packaging task how do you envision those who use the "official" puppet Gem released to rubygems.org realizing this change in behavior? Do you have a sense of when the PR will be updated with suggestions? I ask because I'll be traveling for awhile starting tomorrow morning and would love to sort this out before then. Thanks for reviewing it. Cheers, -- *Jeff McCune <http://jeffmccune.com/>* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CAOXx1vEReTY5rbqRZO7gPun_FUb1Z65Njd77TjkkgK9aadBYtA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
