----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Sorenson" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 5:09:54 PM > Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Status of Data in modules > > > > On Jan 3, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Fabio Sangiovanni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok, I get it. First rule of data in modules: you don't talk about data in > > modules. > > > > Hah! No, I just don't like to reply until I have something substantial to > report. Did you see this thread from a couple of weeks ago? It was only on > puppet-dev so if you're following this in puppet-users you may have missed > it: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-dev/f0KrpOtfKRY/discussion > > Next steps out of that were that I'm pulling together a google doc, which I > haven't finished yet due to holidays. > > I'm excited that people are working with the module_data implementation. The > main technical concern I have is forward and backward compatibility: how > should a module express that it needs a particular implementation of DIM?
the same way the module declares it needs puppet > 3, or the new parser and any other related things. These are not hiera questions, but once you solve the underlying problem that a module needs this would just slot into that. At the moment my module is broken on 3.4 because you've changed some internals sadly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/1154392223.401.1388769263748.JavaMail.zimbra%40devco.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
