Okay, now to introduce my bias into the conversation now that others have
responded.

A - always want to reboot even if other unrelated events fail.


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Ethan Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Likewise A.
>
> I was part of the initial discussion earlier yesterday, and to me this
> felt like the most pragmatic thing to do under the circumstances.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Andy Parker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Rob Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> So far it sounds like option A, but I think there was a thought started
>>> here that you could just order everything so that the reboot occurs last.
>>> Then if there is an issue along the way, the next run (provided it doesn't
>>> also error) will cause the reboot to happen.
>>>
>>> Which could technically meet both approaches.  But perhaps we could add
>>> a `continue_on_catalog_error => true` as default. Then someone can make
>>> that decision themselves.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>> I think go for A, and leave out the property. Option A is the normal
>> puppet semantics (the resource didn't fail, other unrelated things did). If
>> it turns out that there are actual cases that users reach where they need
>> to stop the reboot because unrelated problems happen, then we can add in
>> the feature, but I think we should take a bit of an opinionated stance at
>> first and modify that as real uses are found.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Josh Cooper <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:19 PM, badgerious <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If we support this functionality and there is a failure during the
>>>>>> catalog run after a reboot at the end has been requested, what would be
>>>>>> your expectation for the system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you expect it to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> A) still reboot
>>>>>>
>>>>> B) not reboot
>>>>>>
>>>>> C) something else (please comment)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I vote A. As I understand it, skipping the reboot means throwing it
>>>>> into the oblivion; there's no way for the next puppet run to pick the
>>>>> reboot up because the event triggering it probably won't occur again.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If a notify/subscribe relationship causes a reboot to be scheduled, but
>>>> is not performed due some other resource failing, then the event will be
>>>> lost. This is a general problem with events in puppet actually[1].
>>>>
>>>> If puppet detected that a reboot is pending, e.g.
>>>> HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session
>>>> Manager\PendingFileRenameOperations, and a reboot is scheduled, but not
>>>> performed for same reasons as above, then puppet should reschedule the
>>>> reboot the next time it runs (assuming the catalog remains the same).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I've had plenty of small, inconsequential failures and wouldn't want
>>>>> them affecting other (reboot requiring) things.
>>>>>
>>>>> It may be in a state that won't boot cleanly due to the failing half
>>>>>> run catalog.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think that a sequence of steps that may result in an
>>>>> unbootable system should be ordered such that the last item is the reboot,
>>>>> which would get around that issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>>>   --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So it sounds like there is agreement on option A?
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/3806
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Josh Cooper
>>>> Developer, Puppet Labs
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rob Reynolds
>>> Developer, Puppet Labs
>>>
>>> Join us at PuppetConf 2014, September 23-24 in San Francisco
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Parker
>> [email protected]
>> Freenode: zaphod42
>> Twitter: @aparker42
>> Software Developer
>>
>> *Join us at PuppetConf 2014, September 23-24 in San Francisco*
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Puppet Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Ethan Brown
> [email protected]
> Software Engineer
>
>
> *Join us at PuppetConf 2014, September 23-24 in San Francisco*
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
Rob Reynolds
Developer, Puppet Labs

Join us at PuppetConf 2014, September 23-24 in San Francisco

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to