Hello,
If you care about precision, why not give the standard error or a
confidence interval?
Best, Oliver
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Anthony Mallia <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Here is where I think we landed today on decimal
>
> fhir:decimal rdf:type owl:Class ;
> rdfs:subClassOf fhir:Element ,
> [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
> owl:onProperty fhir:fractionDigits ;
> owl:maxQualifiedCardinality
> "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
> owl:onDataRange xsd:nonNegativeInteger
> ] ,
> [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
> owl:onProperty fhir:fractionDigits ;
> owl:allValuesFrom xsd:nonNegativeInteger
> ] ,
> [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
> owl:onProperty fhir:value ;
> owl:maxQualifiedCardinality
> "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
> owl:onDataRange xsd:decimal
> ] ,
> [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
> owl:onProperty fhir:value ;
> owl:allValuesFrom xsd:decimal
> ] ;
>
> rdfs:comment "A rational number with defined precision" .
>
> Tony Mallia
>
--
Oliver Ruebenacker
Senior Software Engineer, Diabetes Portal
<http://www.type2diabetesgenetics.org/>, Broad Institute
<http://www.broadinstitute.org/>
