On 12/21/2014 09:04 PM, Timothy W. Cook wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to
compare and contrast the various approaches that different
individuals have taken toward developing a FHIR ontology. (Others
were presented previously.) The joint HL7-W3C group on RDF for
Semantic Interoperability
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?__title=RDF_for_Semantic___Interoperability
<http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability>
is working to converge on an ontology that could be adopted as a
standard by the HL7 FHIR work group. As such, it is only an input
to our process rather than a final result (though Cecil may well use
it himself as currently is).
​Thanks for the clarification David. Did I miss links to other ontology
examples?
If so could you re-post them or put them on the wiki page?
We have reviewed four FHIR ontology approaches, but now that you mention
it, I don't think the others posted their actual ontologies, though they
did post slides that are linked from the Work Projects section:
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability#FHIR_ontology
Tony, Claude and Eric, can you please post links to your FHIR
ontologies? Or if you don't have them on the web already you could
(privately) send them to me and I'll post them on the web and then post
a link to them.
Thanks,
David Booth
