Draft minutes are at
http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html
and in plain text below.

      ---------------------------------------------------------
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                    HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS

18 Nov 2014

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Brian_Pech, Bryn_Rhodes, David_Booth, EricPrud'hommeaux,
          Ingeborg, Joshua_Phillips, Kerstin_Forsberg,
          Marc_Twagirumukiza, Paul_Knapp, Rob_Hausam, Tony_Mallia,
          Daniel_Karlsson, Vassil

   Regrets
   Chair
          David Booth (and Paul Knapp)

   Scribe
          ericP

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Minutes
         2. [5]previous minutes
         3. [6]Logistics
         4. [7]Followup on last week's discussion with Mark Musen
         5. [8]Proposed work items
         6. [9]FHIR ontology
         7. [10]ICD-11 and SNOMED
         8. [11]Bridging VA, Intermountain and other models
         9. [12]Issue tracking
        10. [13]Use Cases
        11. [14]PhUSE-FDA project (formerly CDISC2RDF)
        12. [15]C-CDA RDF representations
        13. [16]High-level concept mapping to RDF (AR typeCodes,
            etc.)
        14. [17]Other work proposed work items
     * [18]Summary of Action Items
     __________________________________________________________

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> Hi every one this is Marc Twagirumukiza
   from Agfa Healthcare

Minutes

   <dbooth>
   [19]http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#
   Agenda

     [19] http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#Agenda

   <dbooth> ITS page:
   [20]http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_WG

     [20] http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_WG

   <dbooth> RDF subgroup:
   [21]http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#
   Agenda

     [21] http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda#Agenda

   <dbooth> Meeting minutes:
   [22]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes

     [22] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes

previous minutes

   <scribe> scribenick: ericP

   pknapp: PROPOSED to accept
   [23]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes as a record of
   the last meeting

     [23] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes

Logistics

   APPROVED: accept [24]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes
   as a record of the last meeting

     [24] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes

   (unanimous)

   dbooth: two wiki choices or this HL7/W3C joint work
   ... which shall we use for administative stuff?
   ... other work, e.g. FHIR ontology, can be on another wiki

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> I support HL7 wiki as well

   dbooth: but for the admin stuff i propose that HL7 host the
   adminstrative wiki

   PROPOSED use the HL7 wiki as the administrative wiki

   APPROVED: use the HL7 wiki as the administrative wiki

   (unanimous)

   ->
   [25]https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteropera
   bility COI Task Force

     [25] https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability

   ericP

Followup on last week's discussion with Mark Musen

   ericP: note the tech topics, e.g. FDA therapeutic areas,
   terminfo, etc.

   <dbooth> The recording:
   [26]https://www.dropbox.com/sh/d7a9bb6ppqgo9xn/AAApWheLsxRSyEKF
   a0Kr4qNna?dl=0

[26] https://www.dropbox.com/sh/d7a9bb6ppqgo9xn/AAApWheLsxRSyEKFa0Kr4qNna?dl=0

   dbooth: any followup on Mark's presentation?

   <dbooth> Rough notes:
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/11-hcls-minutes

     [27] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/11-hcls-minutes

   Tony: following up with MarkM on the details hidden by the ICAT
   interface.

   <dbooth> ACTION: Tony to find out more details about how iCat
   handles ICD-11 ont and report back [recorded in
   [28]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

   <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to point out the snomed examples in
   the FDA TA work

   ->
   [29]https://www.w3.org/wiki/File:Snomedct_extract_descriptive.t
   tl SNOMED example

     [29] https://www.w3.org/wiki/File:Snomedct_extract_descriptive.ttl

   <dbooth> Eric: If you're digging into this, here's an example
   of SNOMED that I took, and found all of the examples of
   everything that they said about it -- level in the cell, test
   results, in range, out of range. All the entities that SNOMED
   teases apart. It would be great to take the same slice of
   ICD-11

   <daniel> There is a new way of representing lab in SNOMED CT as
   of recently

   <dbooth> ... Not a legit SNOMED extraction though, because I
   changed the nubmers to human readable URLs.

   Tony: i've got the 110M SNOMED snapshot from earlier this year.

   <dbooth> David: Might be a good use case!

   ericP: you shouldn't have to dig back into the 110M 'cause i
   already did that

   Tony: still waiting for access details from MarcM
   ... I've been looking at the bits that i've already dug into,
   e.g. allergies to bee stings

   <daniel> Here's an alpha version of new lab content

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> ...just to disambiguate it's Mark

   <daniel> Daniel Karlsson

   <daniel> [30]https://csfe.aceworkspace.net/sf/go/doc10215?nav=1

     [30] https://csfe.aceworkspace.net/sf/go/doc10215?nav=1

   daniel: there's a new style for SNOMED

   Tony: is there a style guide you can point to?
   ... once we dig down into the details of the ontologies, you're
   sucked in for 2 years

   <daniel> [email protected]

Proposed work items

   dbooth: we have lots of potential work items and limited
   resources
   ... we can persue multiple things but it will depend on the
   individual champions.

FHIR ontology

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> I would volunteer in the FHIR ontology,
   --- just as related work to what we did for SALUS project

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza>
   [31]http://www.srdc.com.tr/projects/salus/blog/?p=342

     [31] http://www.srdc.com.tr/projects/salus/blog/?p=342

   dbooth: claude nanjo and ericP have worked on this. we should
   schedule reviews

   Tony: we discussed this in the HCLS COI call
   ... the issues were what models for what use cases and how to
   build the ontology

   dbooth: on one end of the spectrum there's "what ontology
   facilitates machine transformation"
   ... on the other, "what ontology facilitates humen
   understanding"

   Tony: there's also which supports SemWeb inference
   ... we may want to bring these together or maybe not

   Marc_Twagirumukiza: reusable graphs need to be human-readable,
   machine-readable, etc.
   ... we did this for SALUS, "entities" were RDF graphs at the
   domain level. we could map it to other data.
   ... so hoping to contribute to this task

   <dbooth> Eric: I can present what Josh and I did.

   dbooth: so you're stressing the convergence

   <dbooth> Claude's work attempted to be more human friendly.

   ericP: i can present the stuff that Josh and I did

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> Actually what can help there is not to
   'just' ontologyze FHIR but to build up a partitioned reusable
   domain RDF graphs from the complexe information model

   <Marc_Twagirumukiza> those will be a key for converging and
   mapping as well

   dbooth: claude did an ontology as well

   Tony: i can present what i did at VA

   <dbooth> ACTION: Tony and Eric to work with each other and
   Claude to prepare comparison of FHIR ontology approaches
   [recorded in
   [32]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action02]

   <dbooth> My view is that the *most* important is an ontology
   that works well for machine processing -- instance data
   translation, inference, etc. That needs to be the basis. Then
   making it more human friendly -- or conceptually understandable
   -- would be nice to have.

   dbooth: priority should be machine processing

   Tony: agree. "reasoner-friendly"
   ... something we can use with existing tools

ICD-11 and SNOMED

   dbooth: we discussed this earlier.

Bridging VA, Intermountain and other models

   Tony: depends on what MarkM can give me. i have no access to
   the bits.

   <dbooth> David: Not a current work project. Create a wiki page
   for project ideas backlog?

   dbooth: maybe we should create a backlog page

   Tony: rep from VA would be rafael (not on this call)

   Marc_Twagirumukiza: sometimes the backlog becomes a
   brainstorming place with no followup.

   <dbooth> ACTION: David to create a wiki page for backlog
   [recorded in
   [33]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action03]

   Marc_Twagirumukiza: but very necessary, also needs an issue
   tracker

Issue tracking

   <dbooth> Eric: W3C Tracker is integrated with IRC

   ericP: we can start with tracker, which will work with IRC and
   public-semweb-lifesci

Use Cases

   <dbooth> ACTION: ericP to send pointers to existing wiki pages
   [recorded in
   [34]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes.html#action01]
   [DONE]

     [34] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

   <dbooth> (Eric already pointed to the W3C COI page)

   dbooth: what use cases with what goals?

   <dbooth> Eric: Migration of CCDA to FHIR

   <dbooth> Eric: Utility on FHIR RDF that would motivate mapping
   of FHIR XML to FHIR RDF

   dbooth: need different levels of use cases
   ... need one simple enough for a slide, e.g. BP
   ... it would be nice if they could be used across different
   purposes.

PhUSE-FDA project (formerly CDISC2RDF)

   Kerstin_Forsberg: know the CDISC2RDF. can work on this.

   Ingeborg: i know SDTM quite well

   <Kerstin_Forsberg> [email protected]

   <Ingeborg> [email protected]

   <dbooth> ACTION: Kerstin and Ingeborg to prepare a status and
   future state ideas for PhUSE-FDA work [recorded in
   [35]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action05]

   <dbooth> Kerstin and Ingeborg have volunteered to champion the
   PhUSE-FDA work.

   ericP: our use cases for FDA-TA were to:
   ... .. make different studies in the same therapeutic area
   compatible for safety and efficacy analysis
   ... .. make e.g. drugs in differnt TAs comparable for safety
   signals

C-CDA RDF representations

   <dbooth> ACTION: Eric to establish/make a wiki page for C-CDA
   RDF representations work [recorded in
   [36]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action06]

   dbooth: ericP is champion

   Joshua_Phillips: i'd like to work on this.

   <dbooth> ACTION: Eric and Joshua to report on C-CDA RDF
   representations work plan [recorded in
   [37]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07]

High-level concept mapping to RDF (AR typeCodes, etc.)

   Tony: this is kind of light-weight.
   ... "how do you represent the terminology?"
   ... from the top down, identify topics, e.g. transport
   mechanisms

   <Kerstin_Forsberg> FDA/PhUSE Semantic technology project's
   first delivery was "just" to represenet existing CDISC
   foundational standards in RDF. Not representing the actual
   clinical trial data (e.g. blood pressure). Hwoever, they are
   moving beyond that and I know there was a presentation from
   FRDA at CDISC Interchannge conference last week on representing
   CDASH (raw data such as blood pressure) in RDF.

   Tony: it's a style guide. a set of patterns.

   ->
   [38]https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteropera
   bility/TerminologyExpressivity high-level terminology
   approaches

[38] https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability/TerminologyExpressivity

   <Kerstin_Forsberg> There is also a FDA/PhUSE subproject to
   reperesent analysis results data, e.g. avg. blood pressure for
   propulation reported in a study report

   dbooth: if there's already a wiki, use it.

   <dbooth> David: I would caution that there can be so many
   different views on high level models, adoption/use would have
   to be voluntary. I would worry about being perceived as telling
   people how that they MUST do things. But best practices
   recommendations sound great.

   ->
   [39]https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteropera
   bility/FDATherapeuticAreaOntologies#Coding_specificity
   terminology coding example

[39] https://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability/FDATherapeuticAreaOntologies#Coding_specificity

   Tony: i'll list the topics. some may be black holes

   RobHausam_: i'm interested.

   <dbooth> Rob Hausam

   <dbooth> ACTION: Tony and Rob to report their plan on
   High-level concept mapping to RDF work [recorded in
   [40]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action08]

Other work proposed work items

   RobHausam_: want to look at the interface between terminology
   and infor model

   <dbooth> Rob: Propose Term info work

   <dbooth> Eric: Charlie Mead and I created a wiki page on that

   <daniel> I'm in

   <dbooth> ACTION: Tony and all to decide on a wiki for Term Info
   work [recorded in
   [41]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action09]

   <dbooth> ADJOURNED

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: David to create a wiki page for backlog [recorded
   in [42]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action03]
   [NEW] ACTION: Eric and Joshua to report on C-CDA RDF
   representations work plan [recorded in
   [43]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07]
   [NEW] ACTION: Eric to establish/make a wiki page for C-CDA RDF
   representations work [recorded in
   [44]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action06]
   [NEW] ACTION: Kerstin and Ingeborg to prepare a status and
   future state ideas for PhUSE-FDA work [recorded in
   [45]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action05]
   [NEW] ACTION: Tony and all to decide on a wiki for Term Info
   work [recorded in
   [46]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action09]
   [NEW] ACTION: Tony and Eric to work with each other and Claude
   to prepare comparison of FHIR ontology approaches [recorded in
   [47]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Tony and Rob to report their plan on High-level
   concept mapping to RDF work [recorded in
   [48]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action08]
   [NEW] ACTION: Tony to find out more details about how iCat
   handles ICD-11 ont and report back [recorded in
   [49]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

   [DONE] ACTION: ericP to send pointers to existing wiki pages
   [recorded in
   [50]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

     [50] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/04-hcls-minutes.html#action01

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [51]scribe.perl version
    1.140 ([52]CVS log)
    $Date: 2014-11-18 17:10:56 $
     __________________________________________________________

     [51] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [52] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

   [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140  of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30
Check for newer version at [53]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/
scribe/

     [53] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/inference/transformation/
Succeeded: s/issue track/issue tracker/
Found ScribeNick: ericP
Inferring Scribes: ericP
Default Present: DBooth, EricP, +1.604.250.aaaa, +1.678.999.aabb, +1.202
.528.aadd, PaulKnapp, +1.703.983.aaee, Marc_Twagirumukiza, BrianPech, Jo
shua_Phillips, +1.801.368.aaff, BrynRhodes, +1.978.794.aagg, +1.608.310.
aahh, Tony, Vassil, +1.801.949.aaii, Kerstin_Forsberg
Present: Brian_Pech Bryn_Rhodes David_Booth EricPrud'hommeaux Ingeborg J
oshua_Phillips Kerstin_Forsberg Marc_Twagirumukiza Paul_Knapp Rob_Hausam
 Tony_Mallia Daniel_Karlsson Vassil
Got date from IRC log name: 18 Nov 2014
Guessing minutes URL: [54]http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html
People with action items: all david eric ingeborg joshua kerstin rob ton
y

     [54] http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html


   [End of [55]scribe.perl diagnostic output]

     [55] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm



On 11/17/2014 06:12 PM, David Booth wrote:
Proposed agenda for tomorrow (Tuesday):
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=ITS_RDF_ConCall_Agenda

Logistics:
Tuesdays, 11:00am Eastern US (Boston) time zone
Zakim (W3C teleconference bridge).
Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
VoIP address: sip:[email protected]
Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS")
IRC: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS

Thanks,
David Booth

Reply via email to