The messages below should make sense. Stuart is trying to make a doc for rating repositories.
I’ve added some stuff about Linked Data: From http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html (Linked Data Principles) Everything has a URI - publications, documents, people, organisations, categories, ... These URIs are HTTP or HTTPS When RDF is requested, the URIs return RDF metadata RDF/XML supported N3 supported Turtle supported JSON-LD supported There are URIs that are not from this repository There are URIs from other repositories There is a SPARQL endpoint RDFa is embedded in the HTML Is there somewhere I could have taken this from that would be suitable? Anyone care to contribute? It seems like it is a really useful thing to have (modulo a bit of specialisation for any particular domain). (I didn’t want to go over the top on formats, by the way.) Cheers > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Stuart Yeates <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: testable properties of repositories that could be used to rate > them > Date: 13 September 2014 10:31:36 BST > To: Hugh Glaser <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> I notice there is nothing about Linked Data and Semantic Web - would it be >> sensible to have something on this? > > If there's something that's recommended by some standard / recommendation and > is script-testable, you're welcome to add it. > >> So for example does it provide RDF at all? > > It has a question based on http://validator.w3.org/feed/ which validates > RSS, which in turn is either RDF (v1.0) or can trivially be converted to it > (v2.0/atom). I've added a note that this is RSS. > > cheers > stuart > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Hugh Glaser <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: testable properties of repositories that could be used to rate > them > Date: 12 September 2014 14:05:34 BST > To: <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Hugh Glaser <[email protected]> > > Very interesting (and impressive!) > > I notice there is nothing about Linked Data and Semantic Web - would it be > sensible to have something on this? > Well, actually there is Semantic Web:- right up at the start there is a Cool > URI reference, which is the the W3C "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web” note! > > Perhaps there should be a section on this - maybe starting with with whether > it is 5* Linked Data. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html > > But it probably useful to unpick some of this in a less structured way. > So for example does it provide RDF at all? > Formats? RDF, N3, JSON-LD… > > Best > Hugh >> On 12 Sep 2014, at 03:29, Stuart Yeates <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> A couple of us have drawn up a bit of a list of script-testable properties >> of repositories that could be used to rate them. We’re tried to both avoid >> arbitrary judgements and the implication that every repository should meet >> every item: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sEDqPS2bfAcbunpjNzHwB56f5CY1SxJunSBLFtom3IM/edit >> >> cheers >> stuart >
