Hi,

There was the "w3photo" project in 2004, where we've tried to
integrate Jim's vocabulary and other similar ones. It was supposed to
be placed on W3C namespace [1], but unfortunately not done [2], and
the spec page is not available now (but can be found with Wayback
machine). Some documents are still on W3C Wiki [3][4].

Although it's not maintained actually, the outcome was the result of a
certain amount of discussion, and could be still useful.

cheers,

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/image-regions#
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2008Jan/0080.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/wiki/W3PhotoVocabs
[4] http://www.w3.org/wiki/W3PhotoSpec

2014-08-09 15:46 GMT+09:00 Gaurav Vaidya <[email protected]>:
> Hi there!
>
> I’m looking at ways of modeling image annotations from the Wikimedia
> Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator)
> in RDF for my Google Summer of Code project. So far, I’ve found an
> excellent vocabulary (http://jibbering.com/vocabs/image/index.rdf)
> that would allow me to define parts of images in terms of geometric
> shapes and coordinates, onto which I can attach any RDF data I want.
> You can see an example of this vocabulary in use here:
> http://www.kanzaki.com/works/2003/imagedesc/yakitoriya.rdf
>
> Unfortunately, this vocabulary is (1) marked as still undergoing
> testing, and (2) hasn’t been updated since 2003. Does anybody here
> know of a similar vocabulary that is in active development, or an
> alternate approach that might model the Commons’ ImageAnnotator more
> closely?
>
> This project is part of my Google Summer of Code project to expand
> DBpedia’s support for the Wikimedia Commons; if you’re curious and you
> missed my update e-mail on this mailing list last week, you can read
> it here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2014Jul/0210.html
>
> Thanks for your attention!
>
> cheers,
> Gaurav
>



-- 
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "[email protected]"].

Reply via email to