Hi Johan, I think using void for the purposes you describe makes sense. For STW Thesaurus for Economics, I’ve done something quite similar – see http://zbw.eu/stw/void.ttl. A RDFa page for the, e.g., Agrovoc mapping may be found at http://zbw.eu/stw/versions/8.10/mapping/agrovoc/.
The interesting question of versioning the datasets and particularly versioning the mappings is however still to solve … Cheers, Joachim Von: Johan De Smedt [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Montag, 2. September 2013 12:23 An: [email protected]; 'Linked Data community' Betreff: Question: What is Best Practice for a Catalog of ConceptScheme mapping Hi, Good Concept Scheme mappings are valuable assets that may be put in a linked data catalog. What is the best practice to do this? I have considered VoID (http://vocab.deri.ie/void) as one of the vocabularies allowing to express the relationship(s) between the mapped concept schemes and the used mapping property. In the illustration below - The mapping is a Linkset (and a dataset) http://myDScatalog/ConceptSchemeMapping/AgroVoc-EuroVoc - The linkset characterized by the linking properties (linkPredicate) skos:exactMatch and skos:closeMatch. - The mapped skos:ConceptScheme are detailed by datasets in my Dataset catalog. - The dataset description can use (multiple) void:vocabulary properties to indicate the dataset can be processed using any of the following RDF schema - http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core - http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos-xl - http://eurovoc.europa.eu/schema - The linkset identifies the mapped dataset using void:subjectsTarget and the void:objectsTarget (though the distinction between source and subject is less relevant in the given example – because the link predicates listed are symmetric) [cid:[email protected]] Thanks for advice. Kind Regards, Johan De Smedt Chief Technology Officer mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> mobile: +32 477 475934 [mail-TenForce]
