On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 03:28:04PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:37:49AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > > From: Ladislav Michl <[email protected]> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > rules/openssl.make | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/rules/openssl.make b/rules/openssl.make > > > index f2e985b58..2cdaf5259 100644 > > > --- a/rules/openssl.make > > > +++ b/rules/openssl.make > > > @@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ OPENSSL_ARCH-$(PTXCONF_ARCH_ARM64) := debian-arm64 > > > > > > ifdef PTXCONF_ENDIAN_LITTLE > > > OPENSSL_ARCH-$(PTXCONF_ARCH_ARM) := debian-armel > > > -OPENSSL_ARCH-$(PTXCONF_ARCH_MIPS) := debian-mipsel > > > +OPENSSL_ARCH-$(PTXCONF_ARCH_MIPS) := debian-$(call > > > ptx/ifdef,PTXCONF_ARCH_LP64,mips64el,mipsel) > > > > PTXCONF_ARCH_MIPS in combination with PTXCONF_ARCH_LP64 is currently not > > possible in PTXdist upstream. I assume you have local changes to > > platforms/architecture.in. Can you send those as well? > > One of BSP's files is just doing: > select ARCH_LP64 > > I've tried to solve it generic way, but I'm still unhappy the with solution.
What's the Problem with just adding another choice for Mips, just like we have for other architectures? Michael -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
